For counsel and owners

Condemnation cases are decided by experts, not by argument

Liability is rarely in dispute. What is in dispute is a set of technical questions about value, engineering, access and use, and those are answered by witnesses. Choosing them, instructing them and preparing them is most of the work.

Two numbersThe before value and the after value. Almost everything else is support for one of them
Several disciplinesAn appraisal conclusion often rests on engineering, planning and traffic evidence
Deposition firstMost expert evidence is tested long before trial, and most cases settle after it
AdmissibilityAn opinion without a reliable basis can be excluded before anyone hears it

The premise

An appraiser cannot carry the whole case alone

The valuation is the conclusion, and the valuation rests on facts the appraiser is not qualified to establish. Whether the remainder can still be developed is a planning question. Whether the new grade can be reached by a loaded vehicle is an engineering question. Whether the surviving access works for the use is a traffic question.

An appraiser who opines on all of it is exposed on cross examination, and in some cases excluded. An appraiser whose assumptions are supported by the people qualified to make them is much harder to move.

The practical consequence is a sequencing decision. Supporting experts have to be retained early enough that the appraiser can rely on their conclusions, rather than late enough that they are explaining an appraisal already written.

Common questions

Questions counsel and owners ask

How many experts does a condemnation case need

Often one. A straightforward partial taking may need only an appraiser. The question is whether the appraisal rests on assumptions outside the appraiser\u2019s expertise, and if it does, whoever can support those assumptions should be retained.

Is a consulting expert discoverable

Generally not, which is why early work is often done in a consulting capacity before anyone is designated to testify. Rules vary and the distinction should be set at retention rather than assumed later.

When is it too late to retain an expert

Once disclosure deadlines have passed, usually. The more useful answer is that it becomes too late to be fully effective much earlier, because the best expert work shapes the record rather than commenting on it.

Can the same appraiser who valued the property for negotiation testify

Usually yes, and continuity helps. What matters is that the opinion was formed independently and that the file supports it, since everything will be produced.

Does the owner pay for all of this

In most states each side bears its own costs, so expert fees come out of the recovery. Some states shift fees where the award exceeds the offer by a margin, which changes the calculation substantially.

Who decides which experts to use

Counsel, with the appraiser\u2019s input. The appraiser usually knows soonest which assumptions in the valuation need outside support.

Start with the valuation, then work out what it rests on

The appraisal is the spine of a condemnation case. Everything else exists to support or dismantle an assumption inside it.

Scroll to Top